Post Mundane · ottawa

Research

Thirty-nine Ottawa sites are filed by a numbered company, and eighteen name nobody at allOwnership · 2026-09-18One Ottawa site in ten is mixed use, and it carries a quarter of the city's homesLand use · 2026-09-18Ottawa cut $16,661 a home off development charges, and the waiting eats it in twelve monthsThe money · 2026-09-18Ottawa's longest wait comes after the approval, not before itThe pipeline · 2026-09-18The whole developable city is 7.8% of OttawaZoning · 2026-09-17Ottawa's housing pipeline is 41% smaller than the register saysThe pipeline · 2026-09-17Ottawa has two kinds of developer, and the register tells them apartDevelopers · 2026-09-17

Topics

The pipeline2Developers1Land use1Ownership1The money1Zoning1

Site studies

2165 The Alameda2026-09-16

The city, read

Analyticsread 2026-09-28Fortnightly reportread 2026-09-28

The app

The live map

The pipeline · Ottawa

Ottawa's longest wait comes after the approval, not before it

A file sits a median nine months while the city decides. It sits sixteen and a half months after the city has said yes. Twelve thousand homes are in that second queue.

PMPost Mundane · 2026-09-18

Everybody who complains about how long it takes to build in this city is complaining about the approval. Council, consultation, the committee, the delegations — the part with a meeting in it.

That part is the faster half.

Nine months to the decision. Sixteen and a half after it

Ottawa's register gives every live file a status, and those statuses sort into the city's own stages. Group the 433 files by the site they are about — 333 sites — put each site at the furthest stage any of its files has reached, and measure from its most recent filing:

Where the site isSitesMedian months since its last filing
Still being decided1439.0
Already approved12016.6

Those are the same kind of number measured the same way, and the second one is nearly twice the first.

Break the second open and it gets worse. The single longest-waiting stage in the whole register is Agreement / legal clearance — the site is approved, the by-law is in force, and what remains is the subdivision agreement, the securities, the conditions, the lawyers. Sixty-four sites are sitting there. Their median is 19.9 months.

StageSitesHomesMedian months
Circulation / comments5112,1117.7
Submission / completeness363,8908.0
Pre-application564,57511.4
By-law in force566,84913.5
Decision432,42113.7
Appeal147,10115.3
Agreement / legal clearance645,15119.9

What is actually sitting there

These are not marginal files. The longest-waiting approved sites in Ottawa today:

SiteMonths since its last filingHomesOn the file
2506 Innes Rd27.244Concorde Properties
280 Laurier Ave27.018280 Laurier Holding Inc
788 March Rd26.7196SINA
398 Roosevelt Ave26.061ML Westboro Inc
609 Longfields Dr25.990Campanale Homes
1452 Hunt Club Rd25.8176Larga Baffin Ltd
1330 Avenue K25.448325 Pickering Holding Inc

Twelve thousand homes are in the post-approval queue. They have their permission. Nothing about them is contested any more.

Which half of that is the city's fault

We do not know, and the register cannot tell us. This is the honest limit of the reading.

A site at Agreement / legal clearance is waiting on some mixture of two things: the city processing an agreement, and the applicant satisfying conditions — posting securities, closing financing, finalising engineering. A developer who has decided to hold rather than start looks identical in the register to one who is stuck behind a clerk. Both of them show as a date that has not moved.

What the register does establish is where to look. Any argument about Ottawa's speed that stops at the approval is arguing about the nine-month half and ignoring the sixteen-month one. If you want the pipeline to move, the queue with twelve thousand homes in it is the one after the yes.

And there is a reason nobody looks there: the approval has a meeting, a date and an agenda, so it is visible. The clearance queue has none of those. It is just a file that stops changing.

Why the ages are measured this way

Two choices, both of which move the numbers, so both are stated rather than buried.

A site is aged from its most recent filing, not its first. A site that filed a rezoning in 2024 and a site plan in 2026 has been in the system for two years, but it moved four months ago. Ageing it from 2024 would count it as stalled when it is active — and the stalled/active distinction is the entire point of the measurement.

A site sits at its furthest-advanced file. One project routinely carries several applications at once, and the one that has got furthest is the one that describes where the project is.

Change either rule and these tables change. That is why they are written down.

How to check this. Read from the City of Ottawa development applications register on 2026-09-18 — 433 live files on 333 sites. Homes are counted once per site (`tools/lead-gen/wardwolf_sites.py`); a site's position is its furthest-advanced file, and its age is measured from its most recent filing, so a site is never aged by paperwork it has since superseded. Reproduce with `python tools/lead-gen/wardwolf_analytics.py --city ottawa`.

Share

Related

Ottawa's housing pipeline is 41% smaller than the register says

The pipeline · 2026-09-17

The whole developable city is 7.8% of Ottawa

Zoning · 2026-09-17

Ottawa has two kinds of developer, and the register tells them apart

Developers · 2026-09-17

Thirty-nine Ottawa sites are filed by a numbered company, and eighteen name nobody at all

Ownership · 2026-09-18

One Ottawa site in ten is mixed use, and it carries a quarter of the city's homes

Land use · 2026-09-18

Ottawa cut $16,661 a home off development charges, and the waiting eats it in twelve months

The money · 2026-09-18